From the Ground Up: Ensuring Combat Readiness

Share this post

Focus: SPA Perspectives

Categories: Capabilities, Software, Cyber, and Cloud Computing, Systems Engineering, Meteyer

From the Ground Up: Ensuring Combat Readiness Through Space Modeling, Testing, and Futures Planning

Author: Dave Meteyer, Group Leader in the Space and Intelligence Division

Alexandria, VA | September 10, 2025

This is part 3 of a 4-part series.

Read the previous posts here and subscribe to get the final post when it’s published.

Testing space systems on orbit is costly, constrained, and risky. Yet readiness in space cannot be theoretical. In a contested domain where launch cycles are long and failure is costly, the United States must validate its capabilities before they leave Earth.

That’s why the nation’s modeling and simulation (M&S) enterprise—developed by industry, national labs, and government organizations—has become, in the words of Dave Meteyer, Group Leader in the Space and Intelligence Division at Systems Planning & Analysis (SPA), an “exquisite” national capability built up “over many decades.”

These tools allow planners to accelerate timelines, identify vulnerabilities, and improve survivability—all before committing to the launchpad. They are no longer support activities; they are strategic infrastructure.

A National M&S Enterprise with Operational Impact

Meteyer describes this as a “tremendous enterprise across the nation,” emphasizing the role of high-fidelity modeling in reducing cost and risk. “We do as much testing as possible through modeling and simulation to minimize those situations where we actually have to go on orbit,” he explained. That shift isn’t just efficient—it’s decisive.

An integrated ecosystem of digital validation tools enables readiness:

Digital Twins that mirror system behavior in evolving threat environments

Live-virtual-constructive (LVC) test environments that blend live operators, virtual systems, and simulated adversaries

Mission-level simulations that incorporate red/blue interactions and degraded conditions

These environments allow operators and planners to rehearse complex missions, evaluate system resilience, and develop and refine tactics in advance of launch that simulate real threats and degraded conditions.

Meteyer emphasized the cost savings and timeline acceleration this approach brings:

“

“Testing space capabilities on orbit can be difficult, costly, and time-consuming.”

– Dave Meteyer, SPA Group Leader in the Space & Intelligence Division

By shifting validation earlier, modeling reduces rework, compresses development timelines, and increases decision confidence. In an environment where launch or orbital failure can wipe out years of planning, simulation is not optional—it is essential.

Strategic Alignment Through Futures Command

To ensure modeling insights guide long-term planning, Meteyer highlighted the value of Futures Command, a Space Force initiative designed to evaluate the trade space between architectures, operational concepts, and emerging technologies. This initiative brings together:

Operator insight from wargaming and TTP development

Threat-informed architectural analysis

Assessments of emerging technology readiness

The result is better-aligned acquisition and concept development, anchored in validated models rather than aspirational requirements.

“Futures Command lets us assess the trade space between architectures, tactics, and technologies,” Meteyer said. That synthesis supports informed, force design investments.

Operational Example: Designing for Resilience

Consider a communications constellation intended for contested environments. By simulating adversary jamming, orbital debris hazards, and dual-use platforms, stakeholders were able to shift from a monolithic architecture to a layered, redundant one. This decision, informed by digital modeling, protected both budget and mission effectiveness.

What Policymakers Must Prioritize Now

Fund Exquisite Modeling Infrastructure

Sustain and expand LVC testbeds and digital twin capabilities
Require M&S outputs in capability development documentation

Accelerate Test-Led Acquisition

Integrate modeling into Milestone decisions and rapid prototyping
Align threat simulation timelines with PPBE (Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution) and FYDP (Future Years Defense Program) planning

Simulate at the Speed of Threat

Use modeling to emulate PLA and Russian counterspace operations
Build test campaigns that reflect adversary doctrine—not just technical specs

Strengthen the Talent Pipeline

Invest in rotational billets for analysts and operators
Expand joint simulation centers focused on space, cyber, and spectrum convergence

Simulation as Strategic Advantage

Modeling, simulation, and analysis are how we move faster than the threat. They allow the U.S. to field validated capabilities, build resilient architectures, and iterate with speed and confidence.

As Meteyer put it, these “great capabilities” help the Space Force “test and assess capabilities … prior to actually putting systems on orbit.” That is how readiness is proven, not promised.

In our next post, we examine how the Space Force ensures readiness before launch—through high-fidelity simulation, digital validation, and architectural foresight. Then we will conclude the series by looking at how the U.S. can operationalize the Space Force’s mission to act in, from, and to space.

Ready Before We Launch

When adversaries are fielding orbital threats in real time, readiness cannot be deferred. Digital validation gives the U.S. a head start: a way to prove performance, refine tactics, and build credibility without risking assets.

In an era of space warfare, simulation is not a luxury, it’s the decisive edge.

In our final post, we turn to how these capabilities are integrated across the entire Space Force mission: securing national interests in, from, and to space.

Review previous posts in this series and subscribe today to be informed of the final post.

Subscribe for Future FOCUS: SPA Perspectives Updates