Categories: Capabilities, Software, Cyber, and Cloud Computing, Systems Engineering, National Security, Cabaniss
Over the first three posts in this series, we’ve explored the global interdependence of the semiconductor ecosystem, examined the difference between risk and uncertainty in defense planning, and identified infrastructure barriers that often go unseen. Each of these threads points to a central truth: America cannot secure its semiconductor future alone. It will take partnerships between industry and government, across levels of government, and among international allies.
Building resilience requires alignment across agencies with different missions, budgets, and cultures. Without that coordination, investments risk being duplicated, delayed, or disconnected from broader national goals.
Building resilience requires alignment across agencies with different missions, budgets, and cultures. Without that coordination, investments risk being duplicated, delayed, or disconnected from broader national goals.
Key priorities include:
“
Share non-proprietary supply chain data to help identify weak points
Engage in scenario planning with federal partners
Support workforce training initiatives to meet future demand
Invest in redundancy even when margins tighten
“Isolation isn’t the answer,” says Cabaniss. “Strength comes from alignment with like-minded partners who share our security and economic interests.”
Standardized cybersecurity practices
Joint investment in resilient supply hubs
Frequent coordination between allies, not just bilateral agreements
“
Part 1: Beyond the Chip – Why America’s security depends on the entire global semiconductor ecosystem
Part 2: Risk vs. Uncertainty – How flexible planning, not prediction, must shape
Part 3: Infrastructure Matters – Why fabs are only as strong as the systems that support them
We invite you to subscribe and stay informed. Never miss an update as we continue providing the rigorous insights and expert analysis you rely upon to protect and advance our national security.